Developments in Computer, Internet and E-Commerce Law (2009-2010)

Here are the slides used in my presentation to the Toronto Computer Lawyers Group earlier today,  The Year in Review: Developments in Computer, Internet and E-Commerce Law (2009-2010). It covers significant developements since my talk last spring.

The slides include a summary of the following cases and statutory references:

Tercon Contractors Ltd. v. British Columbia, 2010 SCC 4

Internet Broadcasting Corporation Ltd. v Mar LLC [2009] EWHC 844 (Ch)

Gammasonics Institute for Medical Research Pty Ltd v Comrad Medical Sysytems Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 267 (9 April 2010)

Kingsway Hall Hotel Ltd. v Red Sky IT (Hounslow) Ltd. [2010] EWHC 965

BSkyb Ltd v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 86 (TCC) (26 January 2010)

Griffin v. Dell Canada Inc., 2010 ONCA 29

Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v Anadisk LLC 2010 WL 565392 (S.D.Fla. Feb 18, 2010)

Defrontes v Dell Inc. 984 A.2d 1061 (Sup.Ct.RH.Isld.2009)

Major v McCallister (Miss.CT.App. Dec 23, 2009)

DC Laboratories, Inc. v. Hach Co., 2009 WL 2605270 (C.D.Ill.,Aug 25, 2009)

Hines v., Inc. 668 F.Supp.2d 362 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) LLC v Google, Inc. 2010 WL 779325 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 5, 2010)

Scherillo v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. 684 F.Supp.2d 313 (E.D.N.Y.2010.)

LTVN Holdings LLC v. Odeh 2009 WL 3736526 (D.Md.2009)

Brodsky v. LLC  2009 WL 3490277 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2009)

Miller v. Facebook, Inc., No. 09-02810 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 15, 2010)

National Auto Lenders, Inc. v. SysLOCATE, Inc. 2010 WL 527866 (S.D.Fla.Feb. 10, 2010)

Carimate v. Ginsglobal Index Funds 2009 WL 3233538 (C.D.Cal.Sept.30, 2009)

Thomas & Anor v BPE Solicitors (A Firm) [2010] EWHC 306 (Ch) (19 February 2010)

Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61

Crookes v. Newton, 2009 BCCA 392, (leave to SCC granted)

Metropolitan International Schools Ltd. v Designtechnica Corp [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) (16 July 2009)

R. v. Morelli, 2010 SCC 8

Review of the Internet traffic management practices of Internet service providers, Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2009-657, Oct. 21, 2009)

Bill C-22 An Act respecting the mandatory reporting of Internet child pornography by persons who provide an Internet service


Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 1328 (16 December 2009)

Editions du Seuil v Google Inc, Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris 3ème chambre, 2ème section Ruling of December 18, 2009

Columbia Pictures Industries Inc v Fung  2:06-cv-05578-SVW-JC (C.D. Cal. May 20, 2010)

Banyan Tree Holding (P) Limited v Reddy CS (OS) No. 894/2008 (H.C.Delhi. Nov. 23, 2009)

Sheppard & Anor, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 65 (29 January 2010)

PIPEDA Case Summary #2009-010 Report of Findings – Assistant Commissioner recommends Bell Canada inform customers about Deep Packet Inspection

Johnson et al. v. Microsoft Corp. (W.D. Wash., June 2009)

EMI Records & Ors -v- Eircom Ltd,  [2010] IEHC 108

PIPEDA Case Summary #2009-013 Publisher collected and used e-mail addresses for marketing without consent

R. v. Cuttell, 2009 ONCJ 471

Carter v. Connors, 2009 NBQB 317

Warman v. Fournier et al, 2010 ONSC 2126

Boring v Google Inc. 2010 WL 318281 (3rd.Cir.Jan 28, 2010)

PIPEDA Case Summary #2009-008 Report of Findings into the Complaint Filed by CIPPIC against Facebook Inc (July 22, 2009)

Poliquin v. Devon Canada Corporation, 2009 ABCA 216 (Alta.C.A.)

Bill S-4: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (identity theft and related misconduct) (in force Jan 8, 2010)

Bill C-28 Fighting Internet and Wireless Spam Act

BILL C-29 An Act to amend PIPEDA

SOCAN v. Bell Canada, 2010 FCA 123

Telstra Corporation Limited v. Phone Directories Company Pty Ltd. [2010] FCA 44 (8 February 2010)

RecordTV Pte Ltd v MediaCorp TV Singapore Pte Ltd [2009] SGHC 287

Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v  iiNet  Limited (No. 3) [2010] FCA 24 (4 February 2010)

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v. Newzbin Ltd., [2010] EWHC 601 (Ch) (29 March 2010)

Arista Records LLC v Inc. 91 USPQ2d 1744 (S.D.N.Y.2009)

EMI Records & Ors -v- Eircom Ltd, [2010] IEHC 108

Columbia Pictures Industries Inc v Fung  2:06-cv-05578-SVW-JC (C.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2009)

Arista Records, LLC v Lime Wire Group  2010 WL 1914816 (S.D.N.Y.2010)

Sony BMG  Music Entertainment v Tenenbaum, 2009 WL 4547019 (D.Mass. Dec 7, 2009).

Brein v Mininova. B.V., District Court of Utrecht, 26 August 2009

Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc. (N.D. Cal. March 19, 2010)

Autodesk, Inc v Dassault Systems Solidworks Corp. 2009 WL 5218009 (N.D.Cal. Dec. 31, 2009)

Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v eBay Inc. 600 F.3d 93 (2nd.Cir.2010)

Google France v Louis Vuitton Malletier, Official Journal of the European Union 22.5.2010

Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp. 2010 WL 1713241 (Cal.App. 6 Dist.2010)

DOCS-#1270489-V10-Sookman TCLG 2010 Year in Review

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

OPC position on online reputation: search engines must de-index privacy violating personal informationOPC position on online reputation: search engines must de-index privacy violating personal information

Are search engines subject to PIPEDA? Should they be required to de-index web pages such as when information about an individual is inaccurate, incomplete or outdated, ;or when the linked to information is illegal? Should search ...

CRTC Issues CASL (Canada’s Anti-Spam Law) Guidelines, background and commentaryCRTC Issues CASL (Canada’s Anti-Spam Law) Guidelines, background and commentary

Last week the CRTC released its first two “information bulletins” intended to help businesses in interpreting CASL and the CRTC’s regulations under CASL. While certain of the Commission’s interpretations are helpful, some are troublesome as ...

%d bloggers like this: