The media is reporting on what Canada’s new copyright bill will contain. This speculation was instigated by a blog posted yesterday by Prof. Geist in which he claimed to know what is in the bill. PMO Issues The Order: Canadian DMCA Bill Within Six Weeks.
Prof. Geist claims that he knows that the new yet to be introduced bill will mimic Bill c-61 and is reported in the National Post also to claim that it is so bad that, among other things, it would actually “do away with the notion of fair dealing” in Canada.
How does Prof. Geist purport to know all this? It all comes from “unnamed” sources, sources Prof. Geist has refused to disclose, despite being challenged to do so.
Can we conclude anything from all this about what may be in the next copyright bill? Well, no. We have nothing reliable to base any judgements on.
We can’t assess the accuracy about what Prof. Geist says is in the bill. We don’t know the source of the information. We can’t evaluate if the source is in a position to accurately know what is in the bill. We can’t assess the motives of the anonymous discloser or discloser. Would a government insider who really knows what is in the bill make an unauthorized disclosure and risk being sacked for attempting to counter a government decision? If that is what happened here, the reporters missed the real story.
But, even if Prof. Geist was told something about a bill, how can we assess whether it has been reported accurately and without bias? Does anyone really believe the Government intends to abolish “fair dealing”? Not a chance and any such assertion would be another example of pure scaremongering to negatively influence public opinion. We have seen this playbook before. See, Fear Mongering and Misinformation Used to Slag ACTA and A reply to ACTA critics, More hype than facts about ACTA from its critics, Facebook Fair Copyright of Canada: Replies to Professor Geist, Reflections on the liberal roundtable on the digital economy.
I think we need to reserve judgment and see what’s in the bill when it is tabled.
* A reader pointed out that Prof. Geist subsequently posted a tweet saying that “CBC report says I said new bill to end fair dealing. I said no such thing. Clearly stated no flexible fair dealing reform.” http://twitter.com/michaelgeist/status/13493597898reform”. The same statement in the National Post story was not retracted.
For more information about the Copyright Modernization Act or Bill C-11 or copyright reform, see Change and the Copyright Modernization Act.