The Supreme Court released its reasons Friday in an important appeal in which the Court had to decide whether citizens can demand disclosure of records located in the offices of the Prime Minister, Ministers of the Crown, the RCMP and PCO under the Access to Information Act. In Canada (Information Commissioner) v. Canada (Minister of National Defence), 2011 SCC 25, the Supreme Court ruled that none of the requested documents had to be disclosed. The ruling, however, by-passed an important opportunity to clarify the meaning of the term “personal information” in Canadian privacy legislation.
- Subscribe
-
- Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2019-07-06 https://t.co/eOHNji7tfp 2019-07-07
- Misuse of private information and copyright infringement found Bull vDesporte [2019] EWHC 1650 (QB) (26 June 2019) https://t.co/Fr6C76W9AM 2019-07-07
- Major accounting of profit award against game cheats company Blizzard Entertainment v Bossland [2019] EWHC 1665 (… https://t.co/j3iLYIvLkf 2019-07-07
- Amazon found liable as seller for product liability claim https://t.co/Jv7eZlDumr 2019-07-07
- Infringement Lawsuit Filed Against Ainsworth Game Technology https://t.co/g606tkcUye 2019-07-07
- Florida cities use insurance to pay $1 million in ransoms to hackers, Baltimore and Maryland weigh getting covered https://t.co/2d1Wz5lZbv 2019-07-07
- Highlighted Posts
- Browsewraps, fair dealing and Blacklock’s Reporter v Canada: a critical commentary
- CASL: the unofficial FAQ, regulatory impact statement, and compliance guideline
- Change and the Copyright Modernization Act
- Contracting for a cloud computing deal?
- Democracy under threat: Parliament must act
- Developments in computer, Internet and e-commerce law: the year in review (2018-2019)
- Fact checking Michael Geist’s criticisms of the FairPlay site blocking proposal
- Google v Equustek: worldwide de-indexing order against Google upheld by Supreme Court
- Hyperlinking and ISP liability clarified by Supreme Court in Crookes case
- Intellectual property education: are Canadian law schools doing enough to support innovation?
- Is Google a publisher according to Google? The Google v Equustek and Duffy cases
- Law and Innovation: Is Intellectual Property a Path to Progress
- Michael Geist: A question of values
- Michael Geist’s attack on artists over Tariff 8
- Michael Geist’s defense of Canada’s indefensible anti-spam law CASL
- Most popular intellectual property and technology law blogs
- OPC position on online reputation: search engines must de-index privacy violating personal information
- PIPEDA’s global extra-territorial jurisdiction: A.T. v. Globe24h.com
- TPP, copyright, e-commerce and digital policy: a reply to Michael Geist
- US court thumbs its nose at Supreme Court of Canada: Google v Equustek
- Why the CRTC should endorse FairPlay’s website-blocking plan: a reply to Michael Geist
- TwitterMy Tweets
- Interesting Links
- 1709 Copyright Blog
- Canadian Privacy Law Blog
- CanLii
- Copyhype
- Copyright Alliance
- Copyright Board
- Copyright See-Saw (Dr. Ficsor)
- eLegal Canton
- Entertainment & Media Law Signal
- Fight Spam (Government of Canada)
- FOSS Patents
- FUTURE OF COPYRIGHT
- Inforrm’s Blog
- Intellectual Property Blog
- Intellectual Property Watch
- Internet cases
- IP Osgoode
- IP Whiteboard
- IPBlog.ca
- IPKat
- Kluwer Copyright Blog
- Music • Technology • Policy
- Patently-O
- Plagiarism Totday
- Rebecca Tushnet’s 43(B)log
- Spicy IP
- Technology & Marketing Law Blog
- The Trichordist
- ABOUT
This site is published by Barry Sookman personally. It is not affiliated with McCarthy Tétrault or any of its clients. Full bio here. - Archives
