Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
This site is about technology, copyright, artificial intelligence, and privacy law.
Barry Sookman
Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
Subscribe

ISP exceptions

7 posts
  • de-listing orders
  • DMCA safe harbor
  • Intermediary safe harbors
  • ISP exceptions

Quebec IT Framework Act Decision Impact on Search Engines

  • February 23, 2026
  • Barry Sookman
Intermediary liability

In A.B. c. Google, 2026 QCCA 157, the Quebec Court of Appeal held that Google could incur liability under Quebec’s Act to establish a legal framework for information technology (the “IT Framework Act”) for refusing to de-index hyperlinks to defamatory content after acquiring knowledge of its unlawful character. The Court distinguished the Supreme Court’s decision in Crookes v. Newton, interpreted section 22 of the IT Framework Act as imposing obligations on intermediaries once they become aware of unlawful activity, and upheld a de-indexing injunction limited to Quebec.…

View Post
Share
  • Copyright
  • ISP exceptions
  • notice and notice

ISPs fees for complying with Norwich orders: Rogers v Voltage

  • September 14, 2018
  • Barry Sookman

Who bears the costs of complying with Norwich orders? These orders require ISPs to disclose the identify of their subscribers to enable copyright owners to bring legal proceedings against suspected infringers. The issue was resolved earlier today by the Supreme Court in Rogers Communications Inc. v. Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2018 SCC 38.

In an 8-1 decision written by Brown J, (with whom Wagner C.J. and Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Gascon, Rowe and Martin JJ agreed) the Court held that ISPs must bear the costs of complying with their obligations under s41.26(2) of the notice and notice regime.…

View Post
Share
  • C-11
  • c-32
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • DMCA safe harbor
  • DRMs
  • enablement
  • Fair Use
  • Geist
  • Graduated Response
  • infringment
  • ISP exceptions
  • ISP Liability
  • making available right
  • notice and notice
  • Piracy
  • TPMs
  • WIPO Treaties

Change and the Copyright Modernization Act

  • November 7, 2012
  • Barry Sookman

Bill C-11, the Copyright Modernization Act, with a few exceptions, is now law with the publication of the Governor General Order in Council. The fourth attempt to amend the Copyright Act since 2005 succeeded where Bills C-60 (2005), C-61 (2008), and C-32 (2010) did not.

A lot has changed since 2005 when Bill C-60 was first introduced. That Bill would have made a limited, but important, set of amendments. Its summary reminds us that it would have amended the “Copyright Act to implement the provisions of the WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, to clarify the liability of network service providers, to facilitate technology-enhanced learning and interlibrary loans, and to update certain other provisions of the Act.” …

View Post
Share
  • C-11
  • contributory infringement
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • Geist
  • HADOPI
  • ISP exceptions
  • ISP Liability
  • TPMs
  • WIPO Treaties

My remarks to the Senate Committee studying Bill C-11

  • June 22, 2012
  • Barry Sookman

The following are my opening remarks to the Senate Committee studying Bill C-11 earlier today. The link to the webcast can be found here.

I would like to thank the committee for inviting me to appear today to provide input on Bill C-11.

Before starting my remarks, I would like to give you some background about myself.

  • I am a senior partner with the law firm McCarthy Tétrault.
  • I am an adjunct professor at Osgoode Hall Law School where I teach IP law.
…
View Post
Share
  • Copyright
  • cyberlockers
  • infringment
  • ISP exceptions
  • ISP Liability
  • jurisdiction
  • making available right
  • Piracy

Do linking sites infringe copyright?

  • January 18, 2012
  • Barry Sookman

A UK judged ruled on Friday that the 23 year operator of the TVShack.net linking website could be extradited to the US to face a trial for alleged criminal copyright infringement. In rendering the decision the UK court made some important findings about the scope of UK copyright law. They included the ruling that organizing and providing hyperlinks to infringing content from a linking website can infringe the making available right.

The accused, Richard O’Dwyer, owned and operated the site that offered to the public free downloading and/or streaming of thousands of copyrighted movies and television programs, without authorization from the copyright holders.…

View Post
Share
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • cyberlockers
  • DMCA safe harbor
  • enablement
  • hosting liability
  • infringment
  • ISP exceptions
  • Reproduction

Cyberlockers, social media sites and copyright liability

  • January 9, 2012
  • Barry Sookman

2011 was the year US copyright law was put to the test confronting whether cyberlockers and social media sites are liable for infringements contributed to by these sites. Some sites, like Megaupload, Hotfile, and MP3tunes suffered set backs or losses in the US courts. Others, like Visible Technologies the operator of the myxer.com social radio website and most recentlyVeoh Networks were more successful, at least so far.

Despite all of this litigation, key issues are still being litigated and perhaps will only be settled in the US Supreme Court.…

View Post
Share
  • c-32
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • Fair Dealing
  • Fair Use
  • Geist
  • Graduated Response
  • ISP exceptions
  • ISP Liability
  • Piracy
  • statutory damages
  • Three Strikes
  • TPMs
  • WIPO Treaties

Some observations on Bill C-11: The Copyright Modernization Act

  • October 3, 2011
  • Barry Sookman

Last Thursday the Government of Canada introduced into the House of Commons Bill C-11, an Act to Amend the Copyright Act. In a press release describing the Bill, Heritage Minister James Moore and Industry Minister Christian Paradis, stated that the Bill will ensure that Canada’s copyright laws “are modern, flexible, and in line with current international standards” and will “protect and help create jobs, promote innovation, and attract new investment to Canada.”

In the press conference announcing the Bill at the Ottawa office of software producer bitHeads Inc.,…

View Post
Share

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

Barry Sookman
This site is about technology, copyright, artificial intelligence, and privacy law.

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

We may be using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Barry Sookman
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website may use cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.