- The Dark Side of Unattributed Copying and the Ethical Implications of Plagiarism in the Legal Profession https://t.co/qFQZnOMk #
- Access to Megaupload data debated http://t.co/06gDp8K0 #
- Meet the 'Mann' who registered 14,962 domains in 24 hours http://t.co/wTw0TRwj #
- Hundreds Of Thousands May Lose Internet In July due to hackers http://t.co/cRQMGMor #
- Can APIs be Copyrighted? http://t.co/P4VsJPGK #
- Copyright concern could curb Pinterest http://t.co/OzWc0va4 #
- iiNet’s Hollywood ending: what does its court victory mean for copyright law? http://t.co/Mad58Oh3 #
- Oracle Java patent rises like Phoenix from the ashes, can still be asserted at trial http://t.co/6R78QAO9 #
- Oracle asks court to clear up potential confusion over Apache license and Apache Harmony project http://t.co/5seEj7Z7 #
- The pragmatic approach to the copyrightability of API packages: case-by-case analysis http://t.co/ujYX51wL #
- How Not To Fix Copyright – My Response to William Patry http://t.co/lnFYXsPA #
- Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2012-04-23 http://t.co/Yim6ISDl #
- The Italian Google-Case: Privacy, Freedom of Speech and Responsibility of Providers for User-Generated Content http://t.co/9nA5Nt6S #
- The SCC Clarifies the “Real and Substantial Connection” Test in Club Resorts Ltd. v. Van Breda, http://t.co/EOZ5QyRs #
- How Pinterest Spammers Hurt This Small Business Owner http://t.co/UmR3MBq9 #
- Android founder Andy Rubin grilled by Oracle lawyer on Java e-mails http://t.co/rPrnHpAZ #
- 'Assassin's Creed' video game maker sued for copyright infringement http://t.co/z0CZW0tt #
- Meltwater says AP's copyright lawsuit threatens all search engines http://t.co/eg3hOZFF #
- iiNet decision not a free pass: experts http://t.co/pMWNSUIo #
Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2012-04-24
April 24th, 2012 by Barry Sookman Leave a reply »Posted in Computer & Internet Law Weekly Update
Tags: barry sookman computer internet law updates Copyright intellectual property
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 Feed. You can leave a response , or trackback from your own site.
Advertisement
Logging In...
Profile cancel
Last reply was April 27, 2012




This site is published by Barry Sookman personally. It is not affiliated with McCarthy Tétrault or any of its clients. Full bio
William Patry’s book has several great points.
I have a great deal of respect for him since he is one of the marginal who are fearless enough to answer the most basic question: why do we have copyright laws at all.
He sets straight numerous myths following today’s mainstream justification about copyright that it is meant to balance the interests of authors with the interests of the people.
The big predicament his book is that it is founded on incorrect suppositions and as a result it concludes with awfully risky proposals.
Patry thinks that copyright laws are not about giving creators the right to have power over how their works are utilized.
In his view, the purpose of copyright laws is to ensure the most benefits to the public but only give authors the bare minimum to would encourage creativity.
In my critique, How Not To Fix Copyright – My Response to William Patry (http://mincovlaw.com/blog-post/how_not_to_fix_copyright) , I talk about the errors in Patry’s approach and give a lot of detailed commentaries to extracts from his book.