- Subscribe
-
- The Internet, which lives forever, is a stalker’s best torture device http://t.co/dONJCIBXrF ->
- US Supreme Court to hear another Case Involving Licensees in Good Standing who Challenge Patent Rights http://t.co/2t7OD7hUZE ->
- Judge confirms Google's right to jury trial on Microsoft's breach-of-FRAND-contract claims http://t.co/kLDhUWLK1O ->
- Amazon's cloud services cleared for US government use | http://t.co/379H9hPYIN ->
- Chinese hackers who breached Google reportedly targeted classified data http://t.co/rVn3uHIhB6 ->
- Think your Skype messages get end-to-end encryption? Think again http://t.co/GQWCJ27JrE ->
- Eminem's Music Publisher Suing Facebook http://t.co/ArI6NzWsPU ->
- Blogged, Are smartphones computer systems under the Criminal Code? R v Cockell – http://t.co/v1Fde5hPdQ ->
- Highlighted Posts
- A question of values
- Canada’s anti-spam law, too much of a good thing
- Change and the Copyright Modernization Act
- Contracting for a cloud computing deal?
- Copyright law 2012: the year in review in Canada and around the world
- CRTC Issues CASL (Canada’s Anti-Spam Law) Guidelines, background and commentary
- Developments in Computer, Internet and E-Commerce Law (2011-2012)
- Electronic Commerce Protection Regulations – Much Work Remains
- Evaluating the Industry Canada CASL regulations: my submission to the consultation
- Evaluating the Industry Canada CASL regulations: why they are needed
- Fixing CASL: comments on the draft CRTC and Industry Canada regulations
- Hyperlinking and ISP liability clarified by Supreme Court in Crookes case
- Impacts of Bill C-28 (the new anti-SPAM and anti-spyware legislation)
- Is Google News legal?
- Most popular intellectual property and technology law blogs
- My C-32 opening remarks
- My remarks to the Senate Committee studying Bill C-11
- New CASL regulations coming but will they fall short?
- Privacy law PIPA unconstitutional says Alberta CA in UFCW v Alberta
- Reflections on the new CRTC CASL regulations
- Rethinking FISA (Canada's Anti-SPAM law)
- So you want to protect computer programs by copyright, the Oracle v Google and SAS v WPL cases
- Social media, intellectual property and the workplace, is there a gap in the law?
- Some observations on Bill C-11: The Copyright Modernization Act
- The Supreme Court rules on copyright
- Understanding Flava Works v myVidster: does inline linking infringe copyright?
- Will it be illegal to recommend a dentist under Canada’s new anti-spam law (CASL)?
- Recent Tweets
- Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-05-22: The Internet, which lives forever, is a stalker’s best tortu… bit.ly/16Oky4o 45 mins ago
- UKSC releases important decision on duty of confidentiality in Vestergaard Frandsen A/S v Bestnet [2013] UKSC 31 bit.ly/11aJvhk 3 hours ago
- UKSC says electronic fingerprint taken by uncertified device admissible in PPS v Elliott [2013] UKSC 32 bit.ly/11aJ5aP 3 hours ago
- UK ICO Report Highlights Cost of Data Protection – reforms must deliver protection w/o damaging business bit.ly/11aIrKn 3 hours ago
- Distress must be directly linked to data breach for consumers to claim compensation, rules UK Court of Appeal bit.ly/11aIdTH 3 hours ago
- Interesting Links
- 1709 Copyright Blog
- Canadian Privacy Law Blog
- CanLii
- Copyhype
- Copyright Alliance
- Copyright Board
- Copyright See-Saw (Dr. Ficsor)
- eLegal Canton
- Entertainment & Media Law Signal
- Fight Spam (Government of Canada)
- FOSS Patents
- FUTURE OF COPYRIGHT
- Groklaw
- Inforrm’s Blog
- Intellectual Property Blog
- Intellectual Property Watch
- Internet cases
- IP Osgoode
- IP Whiteboard
- IPBlog.ca
- IPKat
- johndegen.com
- Kluwer Copyright Blog
- Music • Technology • Policy
- Patently-O
- Plagiarism Totday
- Rebecca Tushnet’s 43(B)log
- Spicy IP
- Technology & Marketing Law Blog
- The Trichordist
- Categories
- ABOUT
This site is published by Barry Sookman personally. It is not affiliated with McCarthy Tétrault or any of its clients. Full bio here. - Archives
