This article responds to claims made by Professor Geist related to the legal protection for technological measures. A link to the article can also be found here.
- Subscribe
-
- Canadian hockey bag maker sues Adidas unit over bag design http://t.co/SJ9tNkdo5I ->
- Twitter granted 'refresh' patent, vows to use it only defensively http://t.co/vDBzvKFnl0 ->
- Apple Defends Offshore Decisions That Result in Low Taxes http://t.co/ShAC9PDmIA ->
- Amazon Web Services Gets FedRAMP Certification for US Government Cloud Use http://t.co/IrZywBIZ5a ->
- Motiva v. ITC and Nintendo http://t.co/pmBnIfgWBr ->
- Monopoly Without Apology http://t.co/CE4ECEu3dQ ->
- Facebook gets 'like' for action over privacy in Ireland http://t.co/2I6ewR0pQ0 ->
- Champions in Intellectual Property: Innovators and Enforcers http://t.co/oaDurCcP3f ->
- Distress must be directly linked to data breach for consumers to claim compensation, rules UK Court of Appeal http://t.co/DWEn3Vy4W0 ->
- Highlighted Posts
- A question of values
- Canada’s anti-spam law, too much of a good thing
- Change and the Copyright Modernization Act
- Contracting for a cloud computing deal?
- Copyright law 2012: the year in review in Canada and around the world
- CRTC Issues CASL (Canada’s Anti-Spam Law) Guidelines, background and commentary
- Developments in Computer, Internet and E-Commerce Law (2011-2012)
- Electronic Commerce Protection Regulations – Much Work Remains
- Evaluating the Industry Canada CASL regulations: my submission to the consultation
- Evaluating the Industry Canada CASL regulations: why they are needed
- Fixing CASL: comments on the draft CRTC and Industry Canada regulations
- Hyperlinking and ISP liability clarified by Supreme Court in Crookes case
- Impacts of Bill C-28 (the new anti-SPAM and anti-spyware legislation)
- Is Google News legal?
- Most popular intellectual property and technology law blogs
- My C-32 opening remarks
- My remarks to the Senate Committee studying Bill C-11
- New CASL regulations coming but will they fall short?
- Privacy law PIPA unconstitutional says Alberta CA in UFCW v Alberta
- Reflections on the new CRTC CASL regulations
- Rethinking FISA (Canada's Anti-SPAM law)
- So you want to protect computer programs by copyright, the Oracle v Google and SAS v WPL cases
- Social media, intellectual property and the workplace, is there a gap in the law?
- Some observations on Bill C-11: The Copyright Modernization Act
- The Supreme Court rules on copyright
- Understanding Flava Works v myVidster: does inline linking infringe copyright?
- Will it be illegal to recommend a dentist under Canada’s new anti-spam law (CASL)?
- Recent Tweets
- Privacy Commissioner of Canada Sets Out Targets for PIPEDA Reform feedproxy.google.com/~r/MichaelGeis… 7 hours ago
- European Parliament gives green light to start TAFTA-negotiations futureofcopyright.com/home/blog-post… 7 hours ago
- A Copyright Review Bibliography feedproxy.google.com/~r/Copyhype/~3… 7 hours ago
- OPC releases report, The Case for Reforming PIPEDA ow.ly/lkMsp 16 hours ago
- Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-05-23: Canadian hockey bag maker sues Adidas unit over bag design h… bit.ly/14BMF2y 22 hours ago
- Interesting Links
- 1709 Copyright Blog
- Canadian Privacy Law Blog
- CanLii
- Copyhype
- Copyright Alliance
- Copyright Board
- Copyright See-Saw (Dr. Ficsor)
- eLegal Canton
- Entertainment & Media Law Signal
- Fight Spam (Government of Canada)
- FOSS Patents
- FUTURE OF COPYRIGHT
- Groklaw
- Inforrm’s Blog
- Intellectual Property Blog
- Intellectual Property Watch
- Internet cases
- IP Osgoode
- IP Whiteboard
- IPBlog.ca
- IPKat
- johndegen.com
- Kluwer Copyright Blog
- Music • Technology • Policy
- Patently-O
- Plagiarism Totday
- Rebecca Tushnet’s 43(B)log
- Spicy IP
- Technology & Marketing Law Blog
- The Trichordist
- Categories
- ABOUT
This site is published by Barry Sookman personally. It is not affiliated with McCarthy Tétrault or any of its clients. Full bio here. - Archives
